Tuesday, May 09, 2006

The Blood Of Tal Afar...


AP News,

In March, President Bush' cited Tal Afar, a mostly Turkomen city 260 miles northwest of Baghdad, as a success story after U.S. troops regained control there last year.
And that is exactly what the enemy wanted noted by the Associated Press and the Drive-By Media when reporting on a suicide bombing today at Tal Afar,

A suicide truck bomber hit a crowded public market in the northern city of Tal Afar late Tuesday, killing at least 17 people and wounding 35, police said. U.S. troops rushed to the scene to treat the injured, officials said.

The attack occurred about 8:30 p.m. in the center of Tal Afar, according to Col. Abdul-Karim Mohammed of the Nineveh provincial police, who gave the casualty figures. The director of the city hospital, Saleh Qado, said 20 people were killed and 70 injured.

Western journalists are operating in collusion with Islamofascists butchers; whether they are sly enough to know it, or stupid enough to be oblivious. I prefer the latter is true, but it matters little. The effect is the same. As long as the Al Quaida butchers in Iraq can be certain that Western media will peddle their message in predictable fashion, the massacre of innocence will continue. And that is precisely why the blood of Tal Afar is on the hands of journalists today.

Members of the Associated Press and all other news outlets that peddle a similar projection of this story, have become willing accomplices to the enemies of humanity.

The blood is on their hands...

... as if they were the butchers' themselves.

(edited for clarity, 05.08.06:12:45)


Major Mike said...

If you know the play, and help these butchers run the play, then you are on the same side. There is no escaping the fact that the MSM is facilitating the enemy with their stories that play right into the messaging that the terrorists are hoping to get across...I think the words are dupe, or co-conspirator, neither of which happens to rhyme with journalist.

Mr.Atos said...

And they wonder why we are increasingly using the word 'traitor?' Its not that we are ratcheting up the rhetoric as much as they are surrender all propriety!

Boghie said...

The media:

1. Doesn't think there is a war on

2. Or, thinks we won it the day we attacked Afghanistan

3. Or, feels that an American casualty here and there is ok

4. Or, they so distrust conservative ideals and concepts that they think we are another front on the war - ie. Boosh is using the war on terror to sell us oil for lots of money!!!


Do they realize that when they get hammered in this next election they will not come back. Is it a good thing to have a One Party State for decades? But, the alternative (voting for a Democrat who will then vote for Speaker Pelosi) is even more unpalatable.

I think much of the media has already become irrelevant. They, like Err America, are struggling to exist long enough to sway 'the next election'.